0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á¦Á¶¾÷ ¿©¼º ±Ù·ÎÀÚÀÇ °Ç°­ÁõÁøÇàÀ§ °ü·Ã ¿äÀÎ ºÐ¼® - PenderÀÇ °Ç°­ÁõÁø¸ðÇü Àû¿ë -

Health-Promoting Behaviors of the Women Workers at the Manufacturing Industry - Based on the Pender¡¯s Health Promotion Model -

»ê¾÷°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 8±Ç 2È£ p.130 ~ 140
KMID : 0384919990080020130
À±¼ø³ç ( Yun Soon-Nyung ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

±èÁ¤Èñ ( Kim Jung-Hee ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify health promoting behaviors(HPBs) and the related determinants affecting to women workers health based on the New Health Promotion Model by Pender(1996) Data were collected by self-reported questionnaires from 208 women workers at the 8electronic manufacturing factories under the permission of data collection and cooperation with health managers in the factories during the period from September to October 1999. For data analysis. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Pearson¡¯s correlation and Stepwise mutiple regression with SPSS/PC+7.5 version were used.
The results were as follows
1. The average score for the HPBs, consisted of 6 subdimensions was 2.05. The highest mean score was 2.29 in Spiritual growth and the lowest one was 1.66 in Physical activity?
2. No significant difference between general charateristics and HPBs were found.
3. HPBs were positively related to Prior related behavior (r=0.369, p<0.1), self-efficacy (r 0.340. p( .01),social support (r=0.350, pK.Ol). Commitment to a plan action r0.374, p(.Ol). There was no significant correlation between perceived health status. perceived barriers to action and HPBs.
4. The most important variable in HPBs was commitment to a plan action? It. was explained 14.0% out of the total variance of lIPBs. commitment to a plan action? prior related behavior social support self efficacy and perceived barriers to action explained 23 0%.
According to the results of this study, the suggestions were as follows
1. It is necessary to develop program for improving the physical activity and health responsibility of women workers at the manufacturing industry
2. To facilitate and maintain HPBs of women workers, nurses may enhance and plan mutually interactive active HPBs with women workers.
3. Social support at the level of individual workers, supervisors, and the organization is required in order to conduct health promotion program at the factories.
4. Significantly related variables to HIPBs should be identified the direct and indirect paths among them further more.
KeyWords
PenderÀÇ °Ç°­ÁõÁø¸ðÇü, °Ç°­ÁõÁøÇàÀ§, ¿©¼º±Ù·ÎÀÚ
Pender¡¯s Health Promotion Model, Health-Promoting Behaviors, Women Workers
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)